Category talk:Cultural movements
|
|
I don't care much about this category scheme, to be honest. If you people want to do your thing, go ahead! I'll follow your example. New Age is a huge container(category), and everyone has their own opinion on what makes sense. I write when I feel like it. Maybe this category project is part of Library Science. I was thinking about writing an article on priestess since the patriarchy has already reared his head here on the wikipedia(Priest) calling a priestess a male priest. Oh well, history shows how much we lost when the men buried us 2000 years ago, with a few females they couldn't hide, or if they were wives of famous men, then a little tidbit token reference. It's ok really. I understand how deeply ingrained the male God is in cultural movements...sadly God or the Goddess is merely an anthropomorphized spirit, given gender to make "it" more human. BF 18:22, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Art is art
Art is art. Visual art is visual art. Category_talk:Art_movements: "If you want a list of visual art please call it [a list of] visual art." Right now the categorization indicates that music is not art. This doesn't seem like the best plan to me. Hyacinth 21:49, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)