Talk:Fossil record
From Academic Kids
I think NPOV doesn't require 50% of the article to be about Creationism. Perhaps the creationist objections to the fossil record should go into the Creationism article. (They merit at least a link here, though.) --Ed Poor
Yes, there is currently far too much about creationism here - it's supposed to be an article about the fossil record, not about creationism. It also uses the term "Sudden Creationism", which you admitted that you made up. --Zundark, 2002 Jan 8
the following was removed from the page:
However, a few scientists and many non-scientists reject the authenticity of the fossil record, primarily on religious grounds. Those who accept ..., for example, completely reject the fossil record as evidence of evolution.
Not all Creationists reject the fossil record. The Intelligent Design theory, for example, embraces both the fossil record and natural selection, but says that speciation happens through God's intervention.
Therefore, the matter of the fossil record provides a clear but often overlooked distinction between the primary schools of thought within Creationism.
