Talk:Gas sculpture
|
|
This article looks like a similar sort of thing to Four dimensional painting - if this is all there is to say about it, I don't think it should be an article at all. If Miro is the only artist to have proposed/written about this, then the info should really be in the Miro page, IMO. It's silly to have articles about every idea every person ever has, especially if there's nothing to be said about them beyond "Person X had idea Y". --Camembert
- These should both be on the Miro page where they have some context and don't just seem like hot air (little art joke there). Ortolan88
- With the recent update this page might be worth keeping as separate. --141.219.41.163 19:57 Jan 27, 2003 (UTC)
This page is definitely worth keeping if someone could add why the, "supposed 'gas sculpture' at the Universe Zone at the American Museum of Natural History," "is not truly a gas sculpture."-Hyacinth
Why is Peter Willberger being trashed like this? Is he just a liar? It doesn't sound that hard to make a gas sculpture, just shoot some air through some liquid. I've done it with a straw and a coke thousands of times. --Anon
- I removed that statement. Google test did not turn up much on that guy. --Menchi 00:15, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)