Talk:Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
|
|
Hmm, why shouldn't I remerge Military of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines? It's hideously stubby... Martin 12:11, 5 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- It's hideous (period) as its own section in the main article. This way, it's out of view. There's the potential for there to be more added. Let's follow the standard country template. --Jiang 22:58, 5 Oct 2003 (UTC)
We're not following Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries for communications and foreign relations - Why follow for military? If more is added, then in due course it can always be summarised here and spun off (as for "foreign relations"). It's bad tmesis, perhaps. Too much reader/editor time wasted following links that provide no additional information. Martin 12:26, 6 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Stop with the discussionless reverting
Astrotrain and SimonP, please stop reverting each other without discussion. Presumably whether to include those templates or not is a decision affecting not just this page, so if the discussion is taking elsewhere please let me know. Pcb21| Pete 18:47, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- No, it's going on all over - half a dozen or more pages on my watchlist. I agree - let the rest of us know where the debate is going on, let's get it resolved! (It isn't like the two of them are the only editors on any of these pages). Guettarda 18:56, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry about all of this. There is some talk about this on the user pages of Astrotrain, Jtdirl, and I. There is also some discussion at Talk:Canada#Templates and just recently at Talk:United Kingdom. In the past the template issue has been much debated at WikiProject_Countries. - SimonP 19:27, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. Guettarda 19:40, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry about all of this. There is some talk about this on the user pages of Astrotrain, Jtdirl, and I. There is also some discussion at Talk:Canada#Templates and just recently at Talk:United Kingdom. In the past the template issue has been much debated at WikiProject_Countries. - SimonP 19:27, May 3, 2005 (UTC)