User talk:Waveguy
|
|
CSB articles
What of interest belongs in Category:CSB_Articles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CSB_Articles)? and Why?
Article Licensing
User:Ram-Man writes:
- Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
- To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
- Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new)| talk)
Unverified images
Hi. You uploaded Image:Coaxial-cable.gif but did not list any source and/or copyright information on the image description page. Please mark it either as GFDL or public domain. See Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags for more info. Please note that images without copyright information may be deleted in the future. Thanks. RedWolf 21:41, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
- Ok, slowly catching up with Policy as it shifts here. All images I've uploaded I drew myself. I'll add license tags Waveguy 19:35, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- RLC circuit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:RLC-circuit.gif)
- tuned circuit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tuned-circuit-1MHz.gif)
- coaxial cable (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Coaxial-cable.gif)
- tuned circuit 1 MHz 20 dB gain (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tuned-circuit-1MHz.gif)
- simple RF probe circuit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:RF-probe.gif)
- diagram of breadboard signal traces (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Breadboard-144dpi.gif)
- diagram of waveform: amplitude modulation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Amplitude-modulation.gif)
- waveguide propagation mode transverse electic 1,1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:TE11.gif)
- waveguide propagation mode transverse electric 1,0 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:TE10.gif)
- hypothetical design for a fractal antenna (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Fractal16.gif)
