Alphabetical Africa
|
|
Warning: the author of this article has not read the work in question.
Alphabetical Africa is a constrained writing experiment by Walter Abish. It is written in the form of a novel.
A paperback edition was issued in New York by New Directions Publishing Corporation in 1974 with ISBN 0811205339. It was still in print in 2004.
The Constraint
The writing is constrained by an interesting pseudo-alliterative rule: the first chapter contains only words starting with the letter a, the second chapter only words starting with a or b, etc.; each subsequent chapter adds the next letter in the alphabet to the set of allowed word beginnings. This continues for the first 26 chapters, until at last Abish is (briefly) allowed to write without constraint.
In the second half of the book, chapters 27 through 52, letters are removed in the reverse order that they were added. Thus, z words disappear in chapter 28, y, in chapter 29, etc..
Implications
The implications of the progressive constraint of the first half of the book, and the corresponding retrogressive constraint of the second half, are more interesting and profound than they might first appear.
As the reader grows accustomed to the constraint, he/she begins to be able to predict some events. For example, it is not clear during the first section that the novel is a first-person narrative. However, a savvy reader might anticipate the appearance of the first-person voice, quite naturally in the first I chapter.
Indeed, the reader begins to understand that some events in the novel are both inevitable, and at the same time painfully arbitrary. For example, the character Queen Quat, only introduced by name in the first q chapter, must inevitably disappear from the narrative in or before the last q chapter.
Errors
Readers have noted that there are several places in the narrative where the constraint is violated. Most counts of these violations number them between three and six. One point of dispute is whether the failures to meet the constraint are intentional, and therefore potentially meaningful, or are simply editing mistakes.